Spl Tribunal rejects whistle blower’s plea for intervention in appeal against JDA’s notice for demolition of Nirmal Singh’s bunglow

BUNTY MAHAJAN

JAMMU, APRIL 18: In a significant order Member (Judicial) Rajesh Sekhri of the J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu on Monday dismissed the application filed by whistle blower Muzaffar Ali Shah advocate seeking his impleqdment as a party respondent in an appeal filed by Mamta Singh, wife of former Deputy Chief Minister Nirmal Singh, against JDA’s order for demolition of her palatial bunglow at village Ban near Nagrota.
The JDA had issued a demolition notice to Mamta Singh saying the bunglow has been constructed without any building permission from it.
Announcing the decision in the open court, the Bench headed by Rajesh Sekhri, Member (Judicial) J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu, observed that it is for the authority passing the order or taking any action against a violator to defend its action on the basis of the material on record and as such, a person cannot be allowed to intervene in a case merely because he is a complainant and the prescribed authority initiated action on his complaint only. The Tribunal while dismissing the application, however listed the main appeal for final arguments on June 9, 2022.
The J&K Special Tribunal while dismissing the application relied upon the several judgments of the Apex Court as well as different High Courts and after relying upon those judgments, the Tribunal observed, “it is manifest from the case law discussed above that a person cannot be allowed to intervene in a case merely because he is a complainant and the prescribed authority initiated action on his complaint only. The subject matter of the appeal on hand is a notice issued by JDA to the appellant and the issue is whether it is justified or not. It is for the respondent JDA to defend the notice on the basis of material on record.” 

It may be recalled that the JDA on November 8, 2021 issued final Demolition Notice under section 7(3) of the Building Control Operations Act, 1988 directing Dr. Nirmal Singh and his wife Mamta Singh to demolish the alleged illegal/unauthorised construction raised at village Ban (Panjgrain), Nagrota on their own within a period of five days failing which the Enforcement Wing of the JDA would carry on demolition of the alleged illegal construction. 
However, Mamta Singh filed an appeal against the Demolition Order and obtained interim relief from J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu whereby the demolition was stayed. The JDA has already filed detailed reply to the appeal as well as application for stay wherein JDA has branded the construction as “Major Violation” as Dr. Nirmal Singh and his wife Mamta Singh did not obtain the building permission from JDA despite the area coming under the purview of JDA being its ‘Local Area’. It may be recalled here that JDA issued Demolition Order only after the matter came in public domain through an RTI Information obtained by Advocate Muzzaffar Ali Shah.