Brig Veteran Anil Gupta
The 11th round of India-China military talks to diffuse tension in Eastern Ladakh held after a gap of nearly two months has ended without any major breakthrough. The marathon talks lasted 13 hours as has been trend in the past but the Chinese side this time was rigid and uncompromising.
Ever since, the successful disengagement of troops from the Lake Area and the Kailash Range in February this year a stalemate exists as far as further disengagement is concerned from the areas of Hot Springs, Gogra, Demchok and stopping of Indian patrols in Depsang. Immediately after the disengagement was completed the 10th round of talks was held between the military commanders of the two nations but it failed to arrive at any consensus as far as further disengagement from the remaining areas was concerned though the talks were dubbed as “constructive” and both sides hoped for a fruitful outcome. A joint statement issued by the two countries after the talks positively appraised the disengagement from Lake Area terming it a significant step that would provide a good basis for resolution of other remaining issues along the LAC in Western Sector.
Much awaited 11th round has once again ended with a stalemate with two noticeable differences. Unlike in the past no joint statement has been issued by the two countries. In another first, the Chinese side has responded with a statement from the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) with the press statement issued by the spokesperson of its Western Theatre Command instead of its Defence Ministry. The statement issued by the PLA was full of rhetoric and laced with diplomatic niceties indicating that it may have been drafted at the Ministry level but issued at the PLA level indicating some sort of unhappiness or disagreement which may need intervention at the highest level.
The PLA statement said, “We hope India can treasure the current positive situation of de-escalation in China-India border regions, abide by related agreements reached by the two countries and the two militaries in previous meetings, meet China halfway and safeguard peace and stability in border regions together”, once again reiterating the “half-way” offer rejected outrightly by India in the past. What to talk of de-escalation the Chinese have not completed even the promised disengagement? A couple of weeks earlier Gen Naravane, Indian COAS, had observed that the threat in Eastern Ladakh has “not gone away altogether” since the PLA was still maintaining its considerable troop strength in the “rear areas” as before. “De-escalation will take place only when these elements go back to their garrisons,”he had said. Much needed de-escalation still eludes both sides.
While the Indian side insisted on complete disengagement from Hot Springs, Gogra, Kongka La and Demchok including the lingering issue of Depsang, the Chinese did not concede to troop pullback from these friction sites as earlier agreed to, leave alone discussing Depsang.
The disengagement from the Depsang plains is believed to be the bone of contention since it is not directly related to the last year’s aggression but is a legacy of the past.
Hectic diplomatic activity had preceded the 11thRound for “maintaining peace and tranquility and provide conditions for the progress of bilateral relations.” The Indian Foreign Minister in a telephonic conversation with his Chinese counterparthad insisted on “early resolution of remaining issues along the LAC and disengagement at all friction points.” In a virtual meeting of Working Mechanism of Consultation and Coordination on India China Border Affairs (WMCC) held in the last week of March, it was decided to hold 11th round of talks between the Corps Commanders as early as possible “to further ease the situation on the ground and jointly safeguard the hard-won peace and stability in the border areas.” All eyes were thus set on the 11thRound hoping not only disengagement from remaining areas but also resolution of the Depsangimbroglio? Why are the Chinese so sensitive to this area and unwilling to concede?
The Depsang plains are sandwiched between the Aksai Chin and Siachen Glacier. Located at the heights of 16-17000 feet above sea level the area provides good mobility to the armoured vehicles. Karakoram Pass and Sasser Law Pass, both strategically important to India located within its territory, are located on its flanks. Much of these plains had been under the Chinese control since mid-1950s. Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO) is also located adjacent to the plains. In 1962, the Chinese occupied much of the Depsang plains west of DBO with India left with a small bulge. The new road built by us to connect DBO with Shyok and beyond is under observation of the Chinese and remains vulnerable to its artillery fire. The area is strategically important because China and Pakistan can jointly threaten India with a pincer movement in a strategic collusion and cut-off the vital area from rest of the Ladakh.Conversely, India can threaten Aksai Chin and China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) though build up for any large-scale offensive would pose serious challenges.
Apart from the varying perception of the LAC, another peculiar factor in the area is the Limit of Patrol (LOP) which is in depth from the LAC. India and China differ on the alignment of LOP as well. The Chinese perception of LOP is almost 20 km beyond our perception inside our territory. The tensions in this area are not recent. The Chinese had intruded in the area in 2013, 2015 during the visit of Xi Jinping and during 2017 Doklam crisis.
The crux of the problem lies in both sides denying each other access to the Patrolling Points (PPs) located on the LOP. Earlier Indian patrols had been patrolling up to PP 11, 12, 12A and 13 and had not moved beyond that till the perceived LAC. But lately, the PLA has been preventing Indian troops from even patrolling till these PPs and the phenomenon has become more pronounced after the Doklam stand-off. Unlike, the Chinese incursions in the Fingers Area (between Finger 4-8), the Chinese did not physically move into the area.
The Indian patrols can move in vehicles only up to an area called “Bottleneck” beyond which the movement is on foot. A kilo-meter or so beyond the bottleneck is “Y-Junction” where the route bifurcates with one fork leading to PP10 to 12 and the other fork leading to PP13. When Indian patrols approach Y-Junction, the PLA troops come in vehicles from a nearby post and stop them from going further up to the LOP. In a quid pro quo, the Indian troops prevent the PLA troops to go ahead of the bottleneck area to their perceived LOP.
To ward off any threat in the area, India has also built up a strong force in the area including armoured vehicles. The logistics sustenance of such a large force and to keep the armoured fleet functional in extreme cold weather is a herculean task.
While India insists on the de-escalation in this area simultaneously with the others, the Chinese prefer a status quo. As it appears both sides are unwilling to relent.
It is reliably learnt that Indian troops are still in possession of a feature in the Lake area that can prove as a ‘trump card” for hard bargaining with the Chinese to secure our interests in the Depsang plains.
(The writer is a Jammu based veteran, political commentator, columnist, security and strategic analyst. The views expressed are entirely personal. He can be contacted at [email protected])
